Re: Is there a way to uniquely identify a local variable in BCEL?
"Dave Brosius" <[email protected]> Tue, 30 May 2006 01:08:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <003e01c683a7$2223b3a0$6501a8c0@MeBigFatGuy> |
In class LocalVariableTable public final LocalVariable getLocalVariable( int index, int pc ) will return the localvariable at the pc specified. This is new to 5.2 And yes -g is required. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wassim Masri" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:33 PM Subject: Is there a way to uniquely identify a local variable in BCEL? > Dear All, > > Is there a way to uniquely identify a local variable in BCEL? > > For instance, in the example below both of the variables x2 and x3 have an > index > equal to 2. So, we cannot rely on the index alone. > > static void foo( ) > { > int x1= 0; > if (x1 >= 0) > { > int x2 = 0; > } > > int x3 = 0; > } > > I looked into using the scope (LocalVariableGen.getStart() and > LocalVariableGen.getEnd()) in addition to the index, but there does not > seem to > be a way to get this information from LocalVariableInstruction. > > In a related (but less critical) matter, it seems that the scope > information is > only accessible when I compile the target code with the '-g' switch on. > > Your help is really appreciated. > > Wes > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >