Re: Bug report for Regexp [2011/05/08]
Dave Brosius <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.cactus.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Given that regexp is attic-ized, should we stop this email, now? On 05/08/2011 03:15 AM, [email protected] wrote: > +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Bugzilla Bug ID | > | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned | > | | OPN=Reopened VER=Verified (Skipped Closed/Resolved) | > | | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=Critical REG=Regression MAJ=Major | > | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement TRV=Trivial | > | | | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > | | | | Date Posted | > | | | | +--------------------------------------------------+ > | | | | | Description | > | | | | | | > |24234|New|Nor|2003-10-29|Doesn't seem to be a way to use '\' in subst with | > |36753|New|Nor|2005-09-21|method subst() on RegExp "^" should work different| > |42058|New|Nor|2007-04-05|subst() doesn't return the original string when no| > |43219|New|Nor|2007-08-27|:graph: should match any printable& visible chara| > +-----+---+---+----------+--------------------------------------------------+ > | Total 4 bugs | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >