Re: Patch 52001
sebb <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:06:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.cactus.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOGo0VZLXK+o2MC5RpzQf2EnchPTAcg2DTnDFC+or6BdoGcFFQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 13 October 2011 18:47, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with you. By the way, please don't top-post; it's harder to follow the thread when it appears in reverse order. > Do we close the issue or we wait for other opinions ? We can wait a while, and then close it. > Thanks > Regards > Philippe > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:45 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 13 October 2011 18:28, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello Sebb, >> > Do you think we should implement issue >> > 52001<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001> >> > : >> > >> > - Add scroll automatically to Summary Report >> > >> > The only use case I see is when you label sampler with a variable name, >> > otherwise you may scroll but it won't last after some time number of >> lines >> > will stay the same. >> >> Yes, it's only needed in limited circumstances, which is why I don't >> really see the need for it. >> >> > If you give me the go, I will patch it. >> >> It's not my personal decision; we make decisions by consensus. >> Any committer can veto a change on a technical basis (e.g. it would >> break something else) but that is probably not the case here. >> >> If it were me, I would not apply the patch as I cannot see the point; >> more code to test and maintain with little benefit. >> >> So I don't support the patch, but if you feel it would be useful I >> won't veto it. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >