Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Parent 96 based on RC1

Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel
Message-ID <CACZkXPw9QYUNs8Kta6EpRpsadHJDTj63jrNaPn7jW0dUaJE=8g@mail.gmail.com>
My +1

Gary

On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 7:48 AM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since the release of
> Apache Commons Parent 95, so I would like to release Apache Commons
> Parent 96.
>
> Apache Commons Parent 96 RC1 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1 (svn
> revision 81951)
>
> The Git tag commons-parent-96-RC1 commit for this RC is
> 7c11bd5e202526f66b99c947a77de42035428ccb, which you can browse here:
>     https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-parent.git;a=commit;h=7c11bd5e202526f66b99c947a77de42035428ccb
> You may checkout this tag using:
>     git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-parent.git
> --branch commons-parent-96-RC1 commons-parent-96-RC1
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1909/org/apache/commons/commons-parent/96/
>
> These are the artifacts and their hashes:
>
> #Release SHA-512s
> #Sat Jan 17 12:45:00 UTC 2026
> commons-parent-96-bom.json=1ec9858f681fbe8b1ba912693fe7cbecc6d5a35abfe417b83da55bbaf3a60a1c8e84acd8cbcb091467190d93a7258b461390b989f55ef74d2541b85bc0c279d1
> commons-parent-96-bom.xml=5d6a691f7ddb531bf12227b79baa9688f6eb61c87c7dfd7847263ccca3b698b3696cf80b5e811c92060f74943d61e2115fa6b72065a2b2c0b2d1bb53072764fd
> commons-parent-96-site.xml=78fbbc6f0f79a0b7c86f7b298675fba49f01f44f08b2211e41a727835c38c4e32e33fb20cf39284ad33afb427116e6a667888f50f87b5f98d64c23788bb7fd3a
> commons-parent-96-src.tar.gz=db46676fe2d817c27f5a12efc579bef43f72a828bd9dd9d0c7f5b12a684247e7688a23256140e8bf0fec8019892bb498e66abc21f3dedfc648cb18ff30d875ff
> commons-parent-96-src.zip=c66dac29bc614282e61eee9ca846d8e30abacf0e2506232e40c7349b219fd88ae1588ed67cb97f3f20447ba055381700b8c29a5018739e98a1959611c7897136
> org.apache.commons_commons-parent-96.spdx.json=435ac8723509804b88c5bf4c0f5ea7b0be36f9fbb28a15fd9620b7a6960b13525a5f6547644a678fa65198b95aacbc88772ac5e7cac279689d3366502f227375
>
>
>
> I have tested this with 'mvn' and 'mvn clean install site' using:
> ***
> Use the output from "mvn -version" for each combination you tested.
> Windows: ver
> Linux: uname -a
> ***
>
> Details of changes since 95 are in the release notes:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1/site/changes.html
>
> Site:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1/site/index.html
>     (Note some *relative* links are broken and the 96 directories are
> not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed.)
>
> *** JApiCmp Report (compared to 95):
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1/site/japicmp.html
>
>     ***
>     Note that the above report notes several errors.
>     These are considered OK for the reasons stated below.
>     These exceptions are also noted in the Changes and Release Notes.
>
>     Errors reported:
>     - methods added to interface: OK because that does not affect
> binary compatibility.
>     - etc.
>     ***
>
> RAT Report:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1/site/rat-report.html
>
> KEYS:
>   https://downloads.apache.org/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gary Gregory,
> Release Manager (using key 530AA5F25C25011F)
>
> The following is intended as a helper and refresher for reviewers.
>
> Validating a release candidate
> ==============================
>
> These guidelines are NOT complete.
>
> Requirements: Git, Java, and Maven.
>
> You can validate a release from a release candidate (RC) tag as follows.
>
> 1a) Download and decompress the source archive from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/parent/96-RC1/source
>
> 1b) Check out the RC tag from git (optional)
>
> This is optional,  as a reviewer must at least check source distributions.
>
> git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-parent.git
> --branch commons-parent-96-RC1 commons-parent-96-RC1
> cd commons-parent-96-RC1
>
> 2) Checking the build
>
> All components should include a default Maven goal, such that you can
> run 'mvn' from the command line by itself.
>
> 2) Check Apache licenses
>
> This step is not required if the site includes a RAT report page,
> which you then must check.
> This check should be included in the default Maven build, but you can
> check it with:
>
> mvn apache-rat:check
>
> 3) Check binary compatibility
>
> This step is not required if the site includes a JApiCmp report page,
> which you then must check.
> This check should be included in the default Maven build, but you can
> check it with:
>
> mvn verify -DskipTests -P japicmp japicmp:cmp
>
> 4) Build the package
>
> This check should be included in the default Maven build, but you can
> check it with:
>
> mvn -V clean package
>
> You can record the Maven and Java version produced by -V in your VOTE reply.
> To gather OS information from a command line:
> Windows: ver
> Linux: uname -a
>
> 4b) Check reproducibility
>
> To check that a build is reproducible, run:
>
> mvn clean verify artifact:compare -DskipTests
> -Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> '-Dbuildinfo.ignore=*/*.spdx.json'
>
> Note that this excludes SPDX files from the check.
>
> 5) Build the site for a single module project
>
> Note: Some plugins require the components to be installed instead of packaged.
>
> mvn site
> Check the site reports in:
> - Windows: target\site\index.html
> - Linux: target/site/index.html
>
> -the end-
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.