Re: release of commons-imaging

Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.user
Message-ID <CACioL_Fdj3vhDLUJRLAHNpMUTPPR_MrCeL4uc4Ge+-NOxov_yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Le mer. 28 févr. 2024 à 16:00, Bruno Kinoshita
<[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> What would be the main difference between the alpha and M1 releases?
>
> I am not 100% confident that we have the public and protected API right,
> > specifically we might have too much public and protected. YMMV.
>
>
> Agreed, and I think if we are to release anything, we would need one or
> more extra releases before we get everything right for the 1.0. But if we
> can continue breaking backward compatibility (even though we will try that
> to only what's necessary to reduce impact to users) with M1/M2/M3, the same
> way we did with the alpha releases, then I'm +1 for that already.

Why not continue with experimental releases using the same scheme
(i.e. "alpha", then "beta") with the agreed on semantics (that compatibility
can be broken)?

> > > [...]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.