Re: SVN strategy

snagy <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:55:14 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.ecs.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
+1 from me; due to the lack of interest in ecs2 and the inactivity in 
general I don't know that it's necessary to keep it around at all.

-stephan

Henri Yandell wrote:

>ECS is largely quite simple with regards to its repository structure;
>the only issue to figure out is the unreleased jakarta-ecs2 version.
>
>It seems to me we should:
>
>move jakarta-ecs to:
>
>jakarta/
>    ecs/
>        tags/
>        branches/
>        trunk/       (jakarta-ecs HEAD)
>
>and then optionally keep the jakarta-ecs2 module as
>jakarta/ecs/branches/ecs2 or jakarta/ecs/newversion or something.
>
>Any +1's/-1's for the general approach, and any ideas on the ecs2 handling?
>
>Hen
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
>  
>