Re: SVN strategy
snagy <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:55:14 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.ecs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 from me; due to the lack of interest in ecs2 and the inactivity in general I don't know that it's necessary to keep it around at all. -stephan Henri Yandell wrote: >ECS is largely quite simple with regards to its repository structure; >the only issue to figure out is the unreleased jakarta-ecs2 version. > >It seems to me we should: > >move jakarta-ecs to: > >jakarta/ > ecs/ > tags/ > branches/ > trunk/ (jakarta-ecs HEAD) > >and then optionally keep the jakarta-ecs2 module as >jakarta/ecs/branches/ecs2 or jakarta/ecs/newversion or something. > >Any +1's/-1's for the general approach, and any ideas on the ecs2 handling? > >Hen > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >