Re: 1.4.2 Release Candidate Available
robert burrell donkin <[email protected]> Tue, 6 May 2003 22:16:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.ecs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 06:15 PM, Robert Lowe wrote: > Abre, > > Have you considered bypassing the output(java.io.OutputStream) method, and > using the output(java.io.PrintWriter) overloading instead? That way you > get > compete control of the encoding. i think that abre was talking about the static method taking a ConcreateElement as a parameter in ConcreteElement. (hopefully he'll correct me if i'm wrong.) <snip> > Actually, I'm a little curious about why each element has its own codeSet > property. It's not as if you'd ever want to specify different code sets > for > different elements in a tree--at least, I can't think of any use for that. i'm not sure (maybe stephen can answer that) but i'd say that it seems like a reasonable way to specify an encoding so that elements can write themselves - robert