Re: [discuss] Slide + HttpComponents => TLP

"Oliver Zeigermann" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2007/8/10, Roland Weber <[email protected]>:
> Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> > Martin's and
> > also my hopes had been that when the - indeed useful - WebDAV client
> > was moved to a different project it could actually be revived. Reasons
> > are that it is functional, useful and of much less complexity than the
> > server. I would at least volunteer to support the initial move
> > (including cleanup) to HttpComponents and once it is there am
> > confident it will attract further contributors. The command line
> > client should be dropped, really.
>
> So the idea would be to leave the server part behind and
> just cut out the WebDAV client based on HttpClient 3.x
> during the move?
> HttpClient 4.x has no API similarity to 3.x at all,
> so it is inevitable that the WebDAV client be ported
> to the new 4.0 API if it's supposed to have a future.
> Content related parts should be re-usable, but everything
> on the method level will need to be re-written.

Got that.

> Moving Slide, or the WebDAV client from Slide, is one
> option. Another option is to leave Slide and it's 3.x
> based WebDAV client behind and just start with a new
> WebDAV client based on the 4.0 API in the new project.
> That would significantly reduce the administrative
> overhead and does not preclude code re-use from Slide.

Maybe that could be a second step.

> While I would like to get rid of HttpClient 3.x rather
> sooner than later, there's no denyig that it will stay
> with us for several years to come. From this angle, it
> would make sense to move the WebDAV client as it is.

Maybe that could be the first step.

WDYT?

Oliver
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.