Re: Cactus Release Archives

sebb <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 29/03/2008, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > Hi everybody,
>  >
>  >  I am following this tutorial:
>  >
>  >  http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess
>  >
>  >  and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I
>  >  have uploaded
>  >  here:
>  >
>  >  http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/
>  >
>  >  and report problems if you find some.
>
>
> Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are
>  slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller...
>
>  The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in
>  the lib directory.
>
>  Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions;
>  if possible, they should be updated.
>
>  The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g.
>  in the META-INF directory)
>
>  It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following
>  attributes:
>
>  Built-By: xxxxx
>  Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus
>  Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
>  Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache
>  Implementation-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT
>  Specification-Title: Jakarta Cactus
>  Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
>  Specification-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT
>  Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_12 (e.g.)
>  X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.)
>  X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.)
>
>  There seem to be some problems with SVN file properties; I've fixed
>  most of them in trunk.
>
>  Did you create the archives from trunk?
>  There are some discrepancies between that and the source archive.
>

Just noticed that the pom.xml does not specify the source and target
java versions.
It should also have inceptionYear

Might be an idea to use a property for the version so the individual
poms don't have to be updated.

The eclipse .classpath file looks a bit odd - it seems to have lots of
entries that don't seem to be required.

>
>  >  If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the tutorial
>  >  and make
>  >  "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them.
>  >
>  >  Thank you all.
>  >
>  >  P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have uploaded
>  >  here:
>  >
>  >  http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/
>  >
>  >  I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as
>  >  "official" Cactus site.
>  >
>  >  --
>  >  Regards, Petar!
>  >  Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>  >
>  >  EOOXML objections
>  >  http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>  >
>  >  Public PGP Key at:
>  >  http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9
>  >  Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
>  >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.