Re: [VOTE] Release Jakarta Cactus 1.8.1
Petar Tahchiev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi guys, can you tell me how to reproduce this behaviour - I am really clueless. I have no idea what triggeres it and I cannot see it locally on my machine. This way I cannot work on fixing it. Thanks, Petar. On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]>wrote: > Yep - turning off my local JIRA got me passed that problem and now I > get the same set of errors as Seb. > > Hen > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Petar Tahchiev > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually Hentry's problem > > was that he had something alreadty running on port 8080. > > > > But you are right. We check if the property is set :-( > > > > Ok, I will try to investigate further. > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:06 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi guys, > >> > > >> > I think I found the problem, but since I cannot reproduce > >> > this behaviour I am clueless if this will work. > >> > I think the problem is here: > >> > > >> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-98 > >> > >> The issue relates to not finding a property - however the code already > >> does a separate check to see if the property has been retrieved OK, so > >> I don't think it applies here. > >> > >> > I changed the version of the Surefire plugin we use to the latest > >> > one. > >> > > >> > I have commited it. Anything else before I make the RC-3 and cast the > >> vote? > >> > > >> > >> Probably best if Henri could provide more info on the failure he saw, > >> which I think was different from mine. > >> > >> I'm also intending to try a test on Unix. > >> > >> I suggest waiting a bit. > >> > >> > > >> > Thanks again, Petar. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Petar Tahchiev < > >> > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Sebb, > >> > > > >> > > I removed the CDDL license and described the servlet-api as > >> > > an Apache 2.0 licensed. I also added the Apache license headers. > >> > > I also changed the version of AspectJ we are using. > >> > > > >> > > About the test failures that you mention I think they are different > >> > > from what Henry is getting. Anyways I am unable to reproduce them > :-( > >> > > > >> > > What should I do? Do I need to make a RC-3 and call the vote on it? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for the tips guys. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:42 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> On 20/01/2009, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > > Hi all, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > maybe I am too impatient, but has anybody tried the > artifacts? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > 1 minor problem - the .asc files should be detached ascii > >> signatures, > >> > >> > not signed archives. > >> > >> > No need to recreate the RC, just recreate the .asc files. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > We don't normally provide binary .sig files - they can be > deleted. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I'm still looking at other aspects of the RC. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> The servlet-api-2.4.jar file is an Apache version, as Henri > already > >> > >> mentioned. > >> > >> The cddl licence should be deleted, and the README updated. > >> > >> > >> > >> Like Henri, I also get test failures: > >> > >> > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 5, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.25 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> > >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.deployment.webapp.TestWarArchive > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 3, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.031 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> > >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.deployment.webapp.TestWebXml > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 54, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 2.359 > >> sec > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> > >> > org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.deployment.webapp.TestWebXmlVersion > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.093 > >> sec > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactifyEarTask > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 3, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.031 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactifyWarTask > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 21, Failures: 21, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > >> 0.281 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> [surefire] Running > org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactusTask > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 7, Failures: 7, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.078 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactusTestTask > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 7, Failures: 7, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.094 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> [surefire] Running > >> > >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestRunServerTestsTask > >> > >> [surefire] Tests run: 6, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.078 > >> > >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !! > >> > >> > >> > >> I ran "mvn test", which failed when it could not find the cactus > >> jars. > >> > >> It would be better if this worked without needing to do "mvn > install" > >> > >> first. > >> > >> > >> > >> I then ran "mvn install" and got the errors shown above. > >> > >> > >> > >> It looks like these are all caused by > >> > >> > >> > >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: The system property > >> > >> 'testinput.dir' must point to an existing directory > >> > >> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) > >> > >> at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20) > >> > >> at > >> > >> > >> > org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.AntTestCase.getBuildFile(AntTestCase.java:370) > >> > >> > >> > >> This is a bit odd, as the directory appears to be there. > >> > >> > >> > >> The assert() message ought to quote the directory name it is > looking > >> for. > >> > >> [I'll update SVN trunk.] > >> > >> > >> > >> Even odder, the problem does not occur when I reran the test. > >> > >> I've tried several times to recreate the error, but it only > happened > >> once. > >> > >> > >> > >> == > >> > >> > >> > >> There are various jetty files under > >> > >> > >> > >> samples/jetty/src > >> > >> > >> > >> which don't have AL headers. Are these Jetty sources? > >> > >> If so, then the source archive really needs to include the > relevant > >> > >> license. > >> > >> If the samples were generated under the ASF, then they need the AL > >> > >> headers. > >> > >> > >> > >> There seem to be some oddities in the main pom.xml: > >> > >> > >> > >> <dependencies> > >> > >> <dependency> > >> > >> <groupId>aspectj</groupId> > >> > >> <artifactId>aspectjrt</artifactId> > >> > >> <version>1.5.3</version> > >> > >> </dependency> > >> > >> > >> > >> specifies version 1.5.3, whereas > >> > >> > >> > >> <dependencyManagement> > >> > >> <dependencies> > >> > >> ... > >> > >> <dependency> > >> > >> <groupId>aspectj</groupId> > >> > >> <artifactId>aspectjrt</artifactId> > >> > >> <version>1.2.1</version> > >> > >> </dependency> > >> > >> > >> > >> specifies version 1.2.1 - I would have expected the two to be the > >> same? > >> > >> > >> > >> == > >> > >> > >> > >> There are several maven.xml and project.xml files in the directory > >> > >> tree - are these still current? > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > What is your opinion expressed by any of the three numbers > :-). > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Petar Tahchiev < > >> > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Hi guys, > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > here comes the second attempt for > >> > >> > > > releasing cactus-1.8.1. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > The artifacts, hashes and signatures are here: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~ptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/> > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/> > >> > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > The tagged code-base is here: > >> > >> > > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/cactus/tags/1.8.1-rc2/ > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > I think it is OK this time. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Here is my +1 > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Please vote. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > -- > >> > >> > > > Regards, Petar! > >> > >> > > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > EOOXML objections > >> > >> > > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Public PGP Key at: > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > >> > >> > > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B > >> 7615 > >> > >> 00F9 > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > -- > >> > >> > > Regards, Petar! > >> > >> > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > EOOXML objections > >> > >> > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Public PGP Key at: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > >> > >> > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B > 7615 > >> 00F9 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Regards, Petar! > >> > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > >> > > > >> > > EOOXML objections > >> > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > >> > > > >> > > Public PGP Key at: > >> > > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > >> > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Regards, Petar! > >> > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > >> > > >> > EOOXML objections > >> > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > >> > > >> > Public PGP Key at: > >> > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > >> > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, Petar! > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > > > EOOXML objections > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > > > Public PGP Key at: > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. EOOXML objections http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9