Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

In message <[email protected]>, Rahul
 Akolkar writes:
>We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
>to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
>my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time
>to consolidate them into a single development list at Jakarta.
...
>Thoughts?

No objections from me.  That's been my preferred course of action
for many years now (along with opening commit access for all Jakarta
projects to all Jakarta committers, if we haven't already done so).

>lists before that. Throw in site-cvs@ as well for good measure.
>* We could repurpose general@ as the one dev list, but OTOH, seems
>worthwhile to maintain the dev / general separation.
>* No changes proposed to the user lists.

I'd rather site-cvs be rolled into a single [email protected]
containing commit traffic for all Jakarta projects.  Redesignate
general@ as user@ to contain user traffic for all Jakarta projects,
retiring all the -user lists in the process.  People can specify the
specific project referred to in the subject a la Commons (e.g.,
Subject: [oro] how do glob expressions work?).  Then add
[email protected] (also like commons).

daniel