Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
>> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
>> discussion after resolving his more narrowly scoped dev@/commits@
>> proposal.  The only reason I haven't resigned from the Jakarta PMC
>> (after attic'ing ORO, now that there's an attic) is because JMeter
>> continues to use ORO and someone needs to be willing and able to
>> fix any issues that may arise.  At least with a combined dev list,
>> there can be some assurance that other committers will be alerted
>> to any problems that require fixing (not that there have been any
>> for the better part of a decade).
>
> Help migrate JMeter off of ORO? :)

Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO,
Regexp and ECS over to Commons.

I'm happy to help out with the move if desired. If active projects
then moving to a new site style and JIRA would come up, but given the
lack of activity I think a gentler migration would imo be fine.

Hen