Re: JMeter TLP - draft resolution and first chair

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:31 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 01:15, Rahul Akolkar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Henri Yandell
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Henri Yandell
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Happy to be on the PMC :) I'm not sure I'll be that active, but
>>>>> hopefully can help with any setup items.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Sebb as Chair.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've updated the resolution to reflect the nomination.
>>>>
>>>> If there are no further changes to the proposal in a couple of days,
>>>> I'll start the TLP vote.
>>>
>>> We shouldn't vote until Sebb, or someone else, is signed up to be the chair.
>>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Thats reasonable too :-) Sebb?
>
> I would have preferred to see JMeter as part of HC, but perhaps it
> would be better as a TLP.
> However I think we need some more PMC members first.
>
> I can think of some Jakarta PMC members who have been involved with
> JMeter recently, and I think some of the Tomcat PMC use JMeter.
>
> Is it OK just to add them, or should they be asked first?

Ask - though any Jakarta PMC member who doesn't want to be a JMeter
PMC member is implicitly saying they're not a Jakarta PMC member now
that Jakarta = { JMeter }.

Hen