[jira] [Commented] (JDKIM-47) James-jdkim should not depend on a logging library implementation
"Jean Helou (Jira)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.james.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17940327#comment-17940327 ]
Jean Helou commented on JDKIM-47:
---------------------------------
fixed in https://github.com/apache/james-jdkim/pull/15
> James-jdkim should not depend on a logging library implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDKIM-47
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-47
> Project: James jDKIM
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tran Hong Quan
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As discussed: https://github.com/linagora/james-project/issues/4453
> Right now, James-jdkim using log4j as a logging library implementation. James-jdkim himself is a library so it should not depend on any logging implementation and should use slf4j abstraction instead.
> We can use slf4j in src/main and keep log4j in src/test
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)