[jira] [Commented] (JDKIM-47) James-jdkim should not depend on a logging library implementation

"Jean Helou (Jira)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.james.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17940327#comment-17940327 ] 

Jean Helou commented on JDKIM-47:
---------------------------------

fixed in https://github.com/apache/james-jdkim/pull/15

> James-jdkim should not depend on a logging library implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDKIM-47
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-47
>             Project: James jDKIM
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tran Hong Quan
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As discussed: https://github.com/linagora/james-project/issues/4453
> Right now, James-jdkim using log4j as a logging library implementation. James-jdkim himself is a library so it should not depend on any logging implementation and should use slf4j abstraction instead.
> We can use slf4j in src/main and keep log4j in src/test



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.