Re: Apache James necessary documents seem to be hidden

Huy Van <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.james.user
Message-ID <CADzF=6pSSK9OnzUv_bVyZ1de6RRfCyoTkByCNvkC5jgL6RA69g@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Apache James community,

I apologize to James community for my ASF-code-non-compliant email. I hope
everything is just confused.

Best regards,
Huy Van

Vào 13:29, T.2, 6 Th3, 2023 Benoit TELLIER <[email protected]> đã viết:

> Hi huy,
>
> I suggest reading the ASF code of conducts [1]. I believe this email is
> not compliant on several points.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Benoit
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html
>
> On 06/03/2023 10:48, Huy Van wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > You can take a look at my previous messages on mailing list:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16663.html
> .
> >
> > I was suggested to go to that site. As you can see the mentioned link is
> > parent folder describing necessary parameter configuration, webadmin api
> > example. The documents have been no longer accessible after a few hours
> > since the suggestions.
> >
> > This's fastest way to realize that spending on Apache James is
> time-wasting.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Huy Van
> >
> > Vào 08:26, T.2, 6 Th3, 2023 [email protected] <[email protected]> đã
> > viết:
> >
> >> Hi Huy Van,
> >>
> >> Where are you get this link?
> >>
> >>   >
> https://james.staged.apache.org/james-distributed-app/3.7.3/operate/
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/03/2023 00:50, Huy Van wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone at open source Apache James,
> >>>
> >>> This is to notify that James is similar to a closed source project.
> >>> Necessary documents at
> >>> https://james.staged.apache.org/james-distributed-app/3.7.3/operate/
> are
> >>> currently not found (404). Documents on James website are outdated with
> >> the
> >>> latest build.
> >>>
> >>> Configuring James now for new users requires to look into source code,
> >>> logic, which is a crazy idea. Yes, it's always easier with technical
> >>> services behind James, but how to be sure that there are no
> "unexpected"
> >>> errors occur during operation in the future, when valuable data going
> >> huge.
> >>> I concern this because james's been contributed & maintain mostly by
> >>> companies providing technical services on James.
> >>>
> >>> If any companies are not at Google, Microsoft, etc level, it's better
> to
> >>> build own distributed business-logical mail system based on postfix,
> >>> dovecot, familiar db shard & replication, etc. It's peace of mind and
> >>> faster building than current document-hidden Apache James.
> >>>
> >>> It's not too difficult unless you want. Hope James project is great in
> >> the
> >>> future.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Huy Van
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.