Re: Hupa or Alternative
Jerry Malcolm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.james.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David, Thanks again. I'm not really concerned about it working properly. Totally trust you there... :-) I have a few specific requirements/desires that I might want to discuss with you. It might be a bit premature now since I haven't yet started playing with it. But I'd like to embed this into my client's backoffice web site and have a user's JWMA instance as part of the user's currently existing profile page. The login to JWMA would be automatic based on the user's profile. The fewer moving parts I have to expose to the user, the better :-). I'm having fits with users having to configure Thunderbird/Outlook/iPhone/Android/etc in order to get their mail. Initially, just having a link to the JWMA client page will be a huge improvement. I'll likely be back to you with a few questions about future integration when I get the first step going. Jerry On 4/29/2023 10:11 AM, David Matthews wrote: >> David, thanks for the quick response. JWMA didn't show up in my >> original google search. It looks like it will definitely meet my >> needs. Is there a forum for tech discussions for JWMA? > hi Jerry > > Any questions - ask me - after you've ready the doc, which is pretty good; it's my project these days. > > I got onto it around 2012 or something like; I thought it looked very pretty, but it worked like ... no I don't want to be rude. Problem was the original people had rolled their own instead of using a framework and the code was pretty pasta like - the long thin stuff. > > I rewrote it all using the stripes framework, which was excellent - very sad that it seems to be slipping to oblivion. I wrote the view stuff for small screen clients, but the desktop view code and appearance is pretty mush as the original guys did it. I tried to rewrite it in "modern" html - doing away with tables, but came to the opinion it wasn't possible. > > I also extended it a bit by making maildir storage format an option - it was mbox only originally. I don't use maildir, so it's not had a lot of testing, but I think it's ok. You'll need maildir of course if james is your imap server as I don't think it does mbox?. mail exchanger, imap server (james acts as both of course) and webmail client must all use same storage format. > > TBH it's unlikely I'll do much more with it as it works perfectly and does exactly what I need. the code is a bit clunking in places where I bolted on stuff I didn't appreciate would be necessary at original design stage, but :-) it's not so bad! > > -- > David Matthews > [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >