Re: Hupa or Alternative

Jerry Malcolm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.james.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
David,

Thanks again.  I'm not really concerned about it working properly.  
Totally trust you there... :-)   I have a few specific 
requirements/desires that I might want to discuss with you.  It might be 
a bit premature now since I haven't yet started playing with it.  But 
I'd like to embed this into my client's backoffice web site and have a 
user's JWMA instance as part of the user's currently existing profile 
page.  The login to JWMA would be automatic based on the user's 
profile.  The fewer moving parts I have to expose to the user, the 
better :-).   I'm having fits with users having to configure 
Thunderbird/Outlook/iPhone/Android/etc in order to get their mail.  
Initially, just having a link to the JWMA client page will be a huge 
improvement.   I'll likely be back to you with a few questions about 
future integration when I get the first step going.

Jerry

On 4/29/2023 10:11 AM, David Matthews wrote:
>> David, thanks for the quick response.  JWMA didn't show up in my
>> original google search.  It looks like it will definitely meet my
>> needs.  Is there a forum for tech discussions for JWMA?
> hi Jerry
>
> Any questions - ask me - after you've ready the doc, which is pretty good; it's my project these days.
>
> I got onto it around 2012 or something like; I thought it looked very pretty, but it worked like ... no I don't want to be rude. Problem was the original people had rolled their own instead of using a framework and the code was pretty pasta like - the long thin stuff.
>
> I rewrote it all using the stripes framework, which was excellent - very sad that it seems to be slipping to oblivion. I wrote the view stuff for small screen clients, but the desktop view code and appearance is pretty mush as the original guys did it. I tried to rewrite it in "modern" html - doing away with tables, but came to the opinion it wasn't possible.
>
> I also extended it a bit by making maildir storage format an option - it was mbox only originally. I don't use maildir, so it's not had a lot of testing, but I think it's ok. You'll need maildir of course if james is your imap server as I don't think it does mbox?. mail exchanger, imap server (james acts as both of course) and webmail client must all use same storage format.
>
> TBH it's unlikely I'll do much more with it as it works perfectly and does exactly what I need. the code is a bit clunking in places where I bolted on stuff I didn't appreciate would be necessary at original design stage, but :-) it's not so bad!
>
> --
> David Matthews
> [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.