Re: It's normal that mail server use expired certs?

cryptearth <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Aug 2025 02:24:14 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.james.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey Ivan,

welcome to Apache James.

There's actually a very recent topic about that very issue: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg17186.html
In the end it comes down to: James lacks the ability to perform a 
non-TLS retry when outgoing StartTLS is enabled and it fails due to some 
TLS ALERT (like the issues you mentioned).

Recommendations?
If you provide others with your service it's your job to make sure your 
users mails get to thier targets. Using James the option is to disable 
outgoing StartTLS and just don't bother with it.
A more sophisticated approach would be to figure out 
hostmaster/postmaster contact info and try to reach out for the 
postmaster in charge to inform them about the issue. But depending on 
how many you have to deal with this can take up hours.

If you're like me and just use your domain and server for your very self 
- well, then just ditch them. If they don't get thier shit in order why 
bother to deal with them?

Unfortunately this is kinda of those "it depends" sitations: Following 
good code it's your responsibility to at least try to reach out to those 
in charge at least try to inform them. But if there's no other way (like 
the hostmaster/postmaster contact info lead to nowhere or just back to 
where you came from) and even try to contact them by classic physical 
letter fails then there's not much you can do.

As an example: As I have a .de domain it's registered by the german 
authority DeNIC. My actual registrar is InterNetworX. I've set them as 
my hostmaster. So when you do a whois on DeNIC and click on "technical 
contact" you get [email protected]. At inwx there's my gmail.com mail 
address registered. So if anyone has issues with reaching me via e-mail 
they can contact my registrar and request them to contact me.
You have a mexican domain. Your registrar seems to be HOSPEDANDO.MX. And 
although I wasn't able to find a hostmaster contact I figured they use 
cloudflare. So in the end if I have trouble to contact you via e-mail 
because your mail server acts up I could try to contact cloduflare for 
the hospedando hostmaster or the mexican authority nic.mx. And although 
none of them would hand me out any information about you as I'm not a 
three-letter "men's club" based in the usa I can request them to try to 
contact you via other means and inform you: "Hey, we got information 
that you messed up your mail server and this guy from germany can't send 
you mails. Fix that please.". Hence I recommend have some global 
reachable contact like a gmail or similar with your registrar.
That's how it's supposed to work. How much effort you put into all of 
this - well, that's up to you.


So long ...

Matt

Am 23.08.25 um 18:43 schrieb Ivan Perales:
> I am new to manage a mail server, but since i am a java programmer i 
> wanted a software that were easly to adapt to my needs, so when i 
> found apache james it fits like a glove.
>
> So in my journey to set it in prod mode i found a lot of problems 
> which i could resolve, for example (understad that i was new) SFP, 
> DKIM, setting correct ehlo name and similars. But the ones i am no 
> sure if have to resolve on my side are those ones involved with TLS 
> communication. My servers logs different fails like:
>
>  * unable to find valid certification path to requested target
>
> * Can't verify identity of server: <domain server here>
>
> * Certificate expired
>
> Checking those certs on the target mail server i found that they are 
> to old, or self signed, that of course means a configuration problem, 
> but they're been running for months even years, if they wouldn't had 
> receiving mails they would had correct it, right? so in order for them 
> to keep that bad config means other server by passes those native cert 
> restrictions and send emails anyway.
>
> So my question is.. do i need to  do that too? this would mean to 
> avoid the nature of certs, so if this has to be this way, why concern 
> about implementing TLS? just for encryption? I set the remote delivery 
> config of verifyServerIdentity to false to bypass one kind of error, 
> but what about the others? What do you recommend me to do?
>
>
> Thanks for your time.
>