Re: [poll] Use Commit Then Review (CTR)

Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel
Message-ID <CABDM8gBkuAg=vT9G5vwd1rz=EcSQZz0MNbjV+0r3=GJBkUWGew__44517.7329167322$1761564842$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
-1

As I have elaborated with objective figures in an earlier post
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/wl1y76q7bhfl1sv9sh2g964bc57llytm>, RTC
works and works very well. Plus, Piotr already volunteered to do the work
for "your employer's use case"
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/8xpg47q7wqvvhw9myqh6fzc8lmotgsz6>.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 12:25 PM Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This is a poll to gauge the waters for CTR.
>
> There is way too much Byzantine bureaucracy in this project.
>
> It's constantly throwing spans in the wheels of progress:
>
> A PR for adding one getter method turns into a request for porting a
> code base from IO to NIO, see
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l23k5n6spfgs05ds06t4hpgmmssqpzvd
>
> Gary
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.