Re: [poll] Use Commit Then Review (CTR)
Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABDM8gBkuAg=vT9G5vwd1rz=EcSQZz0MNbjV+0r3=GJBkUWGew__44517.7329167322$1761564842$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
-1 As I have elaborated with objective figures in an earlier post <https://lists.apache.org/thread/wl1y76q7bhfl1sv9sh2g964bc57llytm>, RTC works and works very well. Plus, Piotr already volunteered to do the work for "your employer's use case" <https://lists.apache.org/thread/8xpg47q7wqvvhw9myqh6fzc8lmotgsz6>. On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 12:25 PM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a poll to gauge the waters for CTR. > > There is way too much Byzantine bureaucracy in this project. > > It's constantly throwing spans in the wheels of progress: > > A PR for adding one getter method turns into a request for porting a > code base from IO to NIO, see > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l23k5n6spfgs05ds06t4hpgmmssqpzvd > > Gary >