Re: [poll] Use Commit Then Review (CTR)
Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACZkXPwytndRghf0hmcbhTrrhSrJm1AaJOLrWf+4rSNa7B=e3g__8469.54922178469$1761587640$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025, 13:43 Matt SIcker <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m in favor of whatever process makes this project enjoyable to > contribute to again. In the past, we embraced the Apache Way of a > “do-ocracy” where people just sort of work on what they want to work on, > and things work out in the end because this philosophy embraces community > over code. Projects that demand perfect code end up dead once the > gatekeeper stops caring about the project (see for example qmail). > Down with the fun! It feels to me like we have process _over_ community, not community over code. Gary > > On Oct 27, 2025, at 6:25 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > This is a poll to gauge the waters for CTR. > > > > There is way too much Byzantine bureaucracy in this project. > > > > It's constantly throwing spans in the wheels of progress: > > > > A PR for adding one getter method turns into a request for porting a > > code base from IO to NIO, see > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l23k5n6spfgs05ds06t4hpgmmssqpzvd > > > > Gary > >