Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.8.0
Stephen Webb <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:43:37 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAO3JxJkq1_iN76W-j022M9nt61CWy00PNm2wOPB3Cmw=_Gd9WQ__4371.15743277303$1784439840$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
What architecture is your compiler targeting? Is it a 32bit system? On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 10:16=E2=80=AFAM Robert Middleton <rmiddleton@apach= e.org> wrote: > > Signatures and checksums are all good, however one of the tests is > failing for me(the patternlayout 2gb test). This is being killed by > the OOM killer. Should we disable the test and require it to be > explicitly enabled? > > -Robert Middleton > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 9:08=E2=80=AFPM Robert Middleton <rmiddleton@apac= he.org> wrote: > > > > I attempted to validate the release, but it seems that dist.apache.org > > is having problems at the moment. I will check tomorrow. > > > > -Robert Middleton > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 2:50=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmai= l.com> wrote: > > > > > > Note that in the future it is not necessary to publish SHA256 hashes, > > > 512 is enough. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:36=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Webb <swebb2066@gmail= .com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This is a vote to release Apache Log4cxx 1.8.0. > > > > > > > > Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/changelog.html#r= el_1_8_0 > > > > GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx > > > > Commit: 5f10a19f444cc84d49e94f8d195edc671cba6287 > > > > Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cx= x/ > > > > Signing key: 077E8893A6DCC33DD4A4D5B256E73BA9A0B592D0 > > > > Review kit: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/blob/master/a= dmin/release-review-instructions.md > > > > > > > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on this mailing list. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, release the artifacts > > > > [ ] -1, don't release, because ... > > > > > > > > This vote is open for 72 hours and will pass unless it gets a net > > > > negative vote count. > > > > All votes are welcome, and we encourage everyone to test the releas= e, > > > > but only the > > > > Logging Services PMC votes are officially counted.