Re: [External Sender] Re: Alternative to PropertyConfigurator while migrating from log4j1.x to log4j1.x bridge

Except that it does in 2.17.2, the site is not up to date, sorry about
that. In this case, there might be a bug when reconfiguring log4j as
opposed to the initial configuration loaded.

Gary

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, 10:46 Jason Wen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Pooja,
>
> We faced the same problem that log4j1.x bridge does not support
> PropertyConfigurator API. See
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/migration.html
>
> #### Limitations of the Log4j 1.x bridge
>
> Applications can migrate by just using the bridge without further code
> changes, if they meet the following requirements:
> 1.    They must not access methods and classes internal to the Log4j 1.x
> implementation such as Appenders, LoggerRepository or Category's
> callAppenders method.
> 2.    They must not programmatically configure Log4j.
> 3.    They must not configure by calling the Log4j 1.x classes
> DOMConfigurator or PropertyConfigurator.
> Our solution is to use log4j2 api to implement what
> PropertyConfigurator.configure does.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> From: Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 5:13 AM
> To: Log4J Users List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [External Sender] Re: Alternative to PropertyConfigurator while
> migrating from log4j1.x to log4j1.x bridge
> Hello Pooja,
>
> Please describe exactly what is happening. The information provided in too
> vague. I take it from previous messages that you are using Log4j 2.17.2
> jars and that there are no Log4j 1 jars on your class path? A reproduced
> would be best, preferably as a failing test in a GitHub PR. Otherwise,
> there is no way for us to tell what your are doing.
>
> Ty,
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, 06:47 Pooja Pandey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > We are using PropertyConfigurator.configure(), but this doesn't work in
> > log4j1.x bridge.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any idea on how to fix it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Pooja
> >
> >
>