Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3
Michael Sokolov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGUSZHAuJbUhKfq=2+8og172fd4vmPr7tLASv2NZnSe8i10cDQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I ran that command ... and it finished SUCCESS! [0:07:40.669238] without ever running any tests at all? On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:49 AM Ankit Jain <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was planning to send a VOTE email today, but was unable to get smoke tests to pass. During smoke test run from the release wizard, only TestTieredMergePolicy was failing which seems flaky - https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13667#issuecomment-3305466611 > Hence, I staged the artifacts and ran the smoke tests from another machine. But now, a bunch of codes and backward-codecs tests also failed. > > I am wondering if this has something to do with my machine or issue in general. Is someone able to run the smoke tests and confirm one way or the other? > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.12.3-RC1-rev-d2cf5568e3965cc642cae3b695fcbeff5bb5c2ed > > > > > Thanks > Ankit > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 1:15 AM Ankit Jain <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Mike for the reminder. I created a signing gpg key and uploaded the same to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/KEYS. Hopefully that should avoid any key related issues. >> Will also get my key signed by one of the committers to prevent tests from complaining. I am assuming that the gpg public key block does not change after getting it signed. >> >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 7:27 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Have you gotten a code signing gpg key? That usually seems to cause some delays since the key must be committed to a file in order for the release to go through >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025, 3:17 PM Ankit Jain <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks Benjamin and Chris. Will kick off the release process later today or tomorrow! >>>> >>>> I can see that all the proposed changes above have already been backported into branch_9_12. Additionally, I see another change >>>> >>>> Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly (#14858) >>>> >>>> that will get released as part of 9.12.3. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Ankit >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:41 AM Chris Hegarty <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Ankit, >>>>> >>>>> I backported the missing DOAP changes for release 10.2.2 and 10.3.0 [*]. I hope the release goes smoothly! :fingers_crossed: >>>>> >>>>> -Chris. >>>>> >>>>> [*] https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/d2cf5568e3965cc642cae3b695fcbeff5bb5c2ed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > On 15 Sep 2025, at 11:59, Benjamin Trent <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Ankit, >>>>> > >>>>> > You got it :). No push back and folks seem ready for a release. You can start the process as soon as today/tomorrow >>>>> > >>>>> > Good luck! >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Ben >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 10:22 AM Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Thank you everyone! +1 for a rare N-2 bugfix release. >>>>> > >>>>> > Mike McCandless >>>>> > >>>>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 8:38 AM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > all fine. It was already backported by Chris. I haven't seen the message, sorry! >>>>> > Uwe >>>>> > Am 14.09.2025 um 15:33 schrieb Uwe Schindler: >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> I'd like to include the bugfix for the Spinloop bug in the shared Arena grouping. I'll backport that in a moment. >>>>> >> Uwe >>>>> >> Am 14.09.2025 um 07:41 schrieb Ankit Jain: >>>>> >>> Hi Chris, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I would like to volunteer and be RM for the first time. Benjamin made a really good point about using bug fix release as stepping stone to minor version release. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Thanks >>>>> >>> Ankit >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 7:28 AM Benjamin Trent <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>> Hey Chris, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Thank you for this proposal. I agree, these are pretty critical bug fixes. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I can be released manager for this one :). Need to shake my "release manager dust" off. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Unless there is someone who REALLY wants the opportunity to do their first time as RM. A big fix release is usually an easier option for your first release. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2025, 10:13 AM Chris Hegarty <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>> Hi, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Lucene 10.3 is not yet out the door, but I’m back proposing yet another release! This time a bugfix release of 9.12. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> My primary motivation for proposing this release is to resolve a number of issues related to sharing of arenas in our mmap implementation. Specifically: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 1. Reduce sharedArenaMaxPermits from 1024 to 64 (#15078) >>>>> >>> 2. Use READONCE to read segment infos (#15074) >>>>> >>> 3. Fix rare spin-loop in RefCountedSharedArena (#15112) >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Any other potential bug fixes for 9.12.3? I will try to find someone to be release manager or volunteer to do it myself if not. Let’s try to get an RC build out towards the end of next week, if possible. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> -Chris. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> P.S. I see that the following bug fix is already in branch_9_12 - Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly #14858 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> Uwe Schindler >>>>> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>> >> eMail: [email protected] >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Uwe Schindler >>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>> > eMail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>