Proposing 10.5.1 bugfix release
Alan Woodward <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Jul 2026 11:39:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Apple-Mail=_B73974DF-D1AF-4B14-9A64-098536912B9E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi all, We=E2=80=99ve found a regression in 10.5.0 due to eager allocation of = large array buffers in MaxScoreBulkScorer - fix proposed here: = https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16316 This particularly hits boolean queries with an expensive two-phase = subclause (in our case, some percolator queries got a lot slower). I = think it probably warrants a 10.5.1 bugfix. - Alan= --Apple-Mail=_B73974DF-D1AF-4B14-9A64-098536912B9E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 <html aria-label=3D"message body"><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" = content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body = style=3D"overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; = line-break: after-white-space;">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>We=E2=80=99ve = found a regression in 10.5.0 due to eager allocation of large array = buffers in MaxScoreBulkScorer - fix proposed here: <a = href=3D"https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16316">https://github.com/ap= ache/lucene/pull/16316</a></div><div><br></div><div>This particularly = hits boolean queries with an expensive two-phase subclause (in our case, = some percolator queries got a lot slower). I think it probably = warrants a 10.5.1 bugfix.</div><div><br></div><div>- = Alan</div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail=_B73974DF-D1AF-4B14-9A64-098536912B9E--