Re: Lucene 10.5.1 bugfix release

Sorry, yes, that’s what I meant!

> On 5 Aug 2026, at 13:51, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I didn';t see a branch_10_5_1, so my backport was to branch_10_5
> 
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:39 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I have back-ported https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450 to the 10.5.1 branch.
>> 
>> Thanks Ignacio!
>> 
>> On 5 Aug 2026, at 12:23, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> OK, I just did that, thanks
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:12 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Sure Michael,
>> 
>> The fix looks well self-contained (and tiny), please feel free to backport it to branch 10.5.
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:36 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> That bugfix  was in https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16403/
>> (commit: 2459ab7749c6062d0ee5a946430745c46cd9fda4)
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 6:33 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Is it possible to also include
>> 
>> * GITHUB#16400: Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field
>> vectors formats,
>> including the default codec. Since 10.4.0 the merger tested the
>> per-field wrapper instead
>> of the unwrapped reader, so every merge rebuilt the graph from
>> scratch. (Jeho Jeong)
>> 
>> this was a pretty bad regression I think, although indexing
>> performance only.  It is lacking a CHANGES entry on main, sorry
>> (because the bug did not occur on main)!  I can address that
>> separately
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 4:46 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> I spoke with Alan offline and I will be the release manager. I am planning to build the release candidate tomorrow if there are no concerns.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ignacio
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:31 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We’ve identified a nasty bug in lucene 10.5.0, where boolean queries using one of the doc-values based range queries as an exclusion clause can return incorrect results (see https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450).  I think this warrants a bugfix release, and I’m happy to act as release manager (unless anybody else would like to volunteer :).
>> 
>> We have a number of bug-fixes in the 10.6 changes section, but none of them look to me as if they are major enough to need back porting.  There are a couple of performance bugs which could go either way but I’d lean towards keeping the release as small as possible to get this fix out quickly.
>> 
>> - Alan
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>