Re: Queries on Lucene Replication Approach
Steven Schlansker <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Aug 2025 09:04:53 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, we use Lucene NRT replication in production. For consistent snapshots, we use SnapshotDeletionPolicy to open a = snapshot, and then copy the snapshot'ed files with your tool of choice like rsync. Without a snapshot, I don't = think such tools work reliably - you can copy commit metadata without the data it refers to, for example. We've run Lucene NRT replication in production for about 4 years now. Overall very happy with it. We intentionally run a simple configuration = (one indexer, N searchers) to avoid difficult problems around leader election and network = partitioning. Definitely took a bit of learning, but overall we would choose this path = again. It is more "hands on" than just spinning up an Elasticsearch cluster - = but on the other hand our previous Elasticsearch cluster took a team just just for "care and = feeding" as the cluster had split-brain issues etc. Compare to Lucene NRT replication, where a = single dev and no ops people=20 can easily manage the entire stack, since all state is on a single = master node. > On Aug 25, 2025, at 8:36=E2=80=AFAM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > If you can guarantee no concurrent updates while you are doing the = copy, > then 3rd-party tools that replicate files such as fsync are fine. But > otherwise or if you have the choice, I would recommend to use Lucene's > built-in support for replication, which can also work if there are > concurrent updates to the index. >=20 > What is NRTLuceneReplication? I cannot find references to it. Lucene's > replicator module does have NRT (near-realtime) support through: > = https://lucene.apache.org/core/10_2_0/replicator/org/apache/lucene/replica= tor/nrt/package-summary.html > . >=20 > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 5:18=E2=80=AFPM sandy A = <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 >> Hi Lucene Community Team, >>=20 >> I have a couple of queries related to Lucene replication and would >> appreciate your guidance: >>=20 >> *Query 1:* >> Is it safe to use tools like *rsync* (on Linux) or *robocopy* (on = Windows) >> for copying Lucene segment files from one server to another? >> I want to understand if there are any potential risks (e.g., partial >> copies, consistency issues) or best practices recommended for such >> approaches. >>=20 >> *Query 2:* >> I noticed that *NRTLuceneReplication* is still marked as "in = development." >> Could you please clarify why it is not yet considered = production-ready? Are >> there known limitations or stability concerns that we should be aware = of >> before experimenting with it? >>=20 >> Any insights or suggestions would be really helpful. >>=20 >>=20 >> With Regards, >> SanthoshKumar A >>=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Adrien