Re: Stale comment in MergeScheduler?
Viliam ġurina <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Mar 2026 16:33:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAO=iB8KLAYZ4Sv6km0b8eAytJKb_UdYKheAH9-2LC29uWBdv8A@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000f1f0ea064d624ad0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like it happens in `IndexWriter.registerMerge()` On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 4:25=E2=80=AFPM Viliam =C4=8Eurina <viliam.durina@g= mail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to understand the merge scheduling in detail, and I stumbled > across this comment: > https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apach= e/lucene/index/ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java#L550-L555 > > This comment is there from the first incarnation of > ConcurrentMergeScheduler (see > https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/299d6357dd296f87a099fadd0764292b2= 8dbde47#diff-23900fa379fb66ff248ad4e66408a76607915862cc2130b35e0cd5686deee6= ac), > but neither in the current, nor in the very first version I don't see any > selection of orthogonal merges. > > Is the comment stale or invalid? > > Viliam > --000000000000f1f0ea064d624ad0--