Re: Specific sequence implementation for a table

Hi Ozkan,

zkn wrote:
...
>> I'm currently locally testing per field sequence manager support and 
>> shortcut names for the supported sequence manager implementations. 
>> Will check in the new features tomorrow (if the test-suite pass 
>> without failures).
>> Then it will be possible to set
>>
>> <field-descriptor
>>          name="id"
>>          column="ID"
>>          jdbc-type="INTEGER"
>>          primarykey="true"
>>          autoincrement="true"
>> >
>>    <sequence-manager className="memory"/>
>> </field-descriptor>
>>
>> for each autoincrement field and if not set, the sequence manager 
>> defined in jdbc-connection-descriptor will be used.
>>
> Will this feature be included in the next 1.0.x version? 

Yep! It's already checked in (SVN OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch).


> And any ideas 
> when this version will be released?

Currently I'm working on a specific "table-per-subclass"-inheritance 
issue and some performance improvements.
The 1.0.4 release was 10 month ago and many bug fixes, improvements and 
new features are checked in. Thus I think it's indicated to release a 
1.0.5-beta before the official release.
I will try to create the beta-version within a week or two.

regards,
Armin