Re: migrating to ojb 1.0.4 NoSuchMethodError
Armin Waibel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.ojb.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, mananthakris wrote: > Turned out that at one place the new jar wasn't copied over. The error is > gone now when that was corrected. > > mananthakris wrote: >> Hi, >> Migrating to ojb 1.0.4 from ojb.1.0.rc4 gives error while trying to get >> Implementation class for odmg-api. >> >> Does ODMGFactory no longer exist? We use to write an mbean in >> jboss-service.xml and use jndi lookup in ejb create to get the >> Implementation. These classes no longer included in OJB jar. But the source code of both classes is included in OJB project source code. You can still use these classes or bind OJB to JNDI by your own or use OJB.getInstance() directly. We removed the JBoss mbean to get rid of JBoss dependencies in OJB jar file. Between ojb 1.0.4 and ojb.1.0.rc4 are some differences, so please carefully read the release-notes to get an impression of changes. In 1.0.4 we harmonize the Identity handling and I forgot to note this in release-notes. Here you can find a detailed description http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg15405.html It's strongly recommended to use the IdentityFactory to create Identity objects (e.g. for "lookup by PK") instead of creating Identity objects by your own. In OJB 1.0.4 the jdbc-connection-descriptor attribute "eager-release" is supported the last time. Since JBoss 3.2 the statement issue is fixed and this attribute is no longer needed. regards, Armin >> this was our code before and does not work because of compilation error >> class ODMGFactory not found. Tried using ODMGJ2EEFactory instead. Does not >> work (gives OJB<init> noclassdeffounderror) >> ODMGFactory factory = (ODMGFactory) ctx.lookup("java:/ojb/defaultODMG"); >> >> Now the document suggests use OJB.getInstance() but this gives error >> NoSuchMethodError: >> org.apache.ojb.odmg.OJB.getInstance()Lorg/odmg/Implementation; >> >> What is the right way to get the Implementation instance? >> >> >