Re: anonymous keys and PK in 1.0.4

Hi Sergey,

sorry for the late reply. Last week I a had DSL malfunction caused by my 
Internet provider. It seems to be fixed (works again for 20 hours), but 
it could happen that I'm out of business again.


 >
 > PersistentBroker.delete(new
 > AmortizedToolingSchedulePO(amortizedToolingSchedule, requisition))
 >

Think this has to do with implementation of "anonymous keys"
http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/guides/advanced-technique.html#How+do
The new created AmortizedToolingSchedulePO object doesn't have any 
mapped anonymous keys in OJB.

regards,
Armin




Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
> Folks,
> 
>  
> 
> Just stumbled on the issue with using anonymous keys which make a
> compound PK of the class.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> <class-descriptor class="com.lear.ojb.beans.AmortizedToolingSchedulePO"
> table="SVZATSDTL">
> 
>  
> 
>       <!-- PK { FK (class="com.lear.ojb.beans.AmortizedToolingSchedule")
> } -->
> 
>       <field-descriptor name="scheduleId" column="SCHEDULE"
> jdbc-type="DECIMAL" length="11" primarykey="true" nullable="false"
> access="anonymous"/>
> 
>  
> 
>       <!-- PK { FK (class="com.lear.ojb.beans.Requisition") } -->
> 
>       <field-descriptor name="reqNumber" column="REQ#"
> jdbc-type="DECIMAL" length="7" primarykey="true" nullable="false"
> access="anonymous"/>
> 
>       <field-descriptor name="reqType" column="POTYPE"
> jdbc-type="VARCHAR" length="5" primarykey="true" nullable="false"
> access="anonymous"/>
> 
>       
> 
>  
> 
>       <reference-descriptor name="amortizedToolingSchedule"
> class-ref="com.lear.ojb.beans.AmortizedToolingSchedule"
> auto-retrieve="false">
> 
>             <foreignkey field-ref="scheduleId" />
> 
>       </reference-descriptor>
> 
>  
> 
>       <reference-descriptor name="requisition"
> class-ref="com.lear.ojb.beans.Requisition" auto-retrieve="false">
> 
>             <foreignkey field-ref="reqNumber" />
> 
>             <foreignkey field-ref="reqType" />
> 
>       </reference-descriptor>
> 
>       
> 
> </class-descriptor>
> 
>  
> 
> So I have a class that has two references, and using 
> 
>  
> 
> PersistentBroker.delete(new
> AmortizedToolingSchedulePO(amortizedToolingSchedule, requisition))
> 
>  
> 
> It gives me error:
> 
>  
> 
> [11:20:38,160] ERROR (PersistenceBrokerImpl) - Cannot delete object
> without valid PKs.
> 
>  
> 
> All references are valid objects... PK are anponymous... so what is
> wrong?
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> 
>  
> 
> -Sergey
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> **********************
> ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
> **********************
> 
> This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
> legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
> this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
> or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this message in 
> error, please immediately notify the sender and 
> delete this E-mail message from your computer.