Re: storing objects

Hi Hans,

Hans Novak wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i am not shure, but is ist correct when i have an object, witch is a 
> tree of some other objects (colletions) and i delete a part of the tree 
> and then store the hole object (tree) - in the database the deleted 
> object will also be deleted ?
> 
> Everything works fine, when i store or update the object, but not when i 
> delete.
> The deleted part of the object will not be deleted in the database. I 
> can remove it by hand, when i run a remove.object  (the part of the 
> tree) and then store the (changed) tree.
> 
> Is this normal ?

It's how OJB currently work. But I agree this is not the behavior a user 
expects when using a "removal aware" collection and above all the 
odmg-api implementation detects the removed/orphan objects and delete them.
OJB (PB-api) ignore the objects detected by the removal aware collection 
on delete of the main object. I will have a look at this.

regards,
Armin


> 
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
>