Re: OJB Development Activity

------=_Part_31804_13626039.1220570075302
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,
Even if it is some time that there aren't new releases, I would say that
this is not a reason to consider a project dead.
It is a very useful project, I have to say that I limit to use just the
persistence broker, but after many years using it I never had a problem, and
I never felt the needing to switch to other most famous mapping tools, and
right now I really don't need more upgrade, I'm satisfied with this job, and
we have to consider how hard is to carry on an opensource project. Then it i
very easy to use, and I know that there are many many people using it. It is
very well documented so there are not many enquiries in the mailing list,
but when there are , they are answered very quickly. So resuming, a good
project, with many people using it, very useful, easy to use a with a good
support in the mailing list. Why dead?
Take care Armin, and thanks for all.

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Armin Waibel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
>
> Jason wrote:
>
>> I have been away from the OJB community for a few years. Based on the
>> state of the website and the SVN repository, it looks like this
>> project has stalled... the last commits were months ago and the last
>> release was in 2005. Is OJB dead, or is active work being done
>> somewhere to work towards finishing 1.1, 2.0, the OTM, et al.
>>
>>
> Sorry for the delay. I took a few "sabbatical weeks" from OJB to spend more
> time with my (newborn) daughter and currently I have some problems with my
> eyes, which makes it difficult to work on OJB.
> I will continue the work on OJB ASAP to prepare OJB 1.0.5_RC2.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

------=_Part_31804_13626039.1220570075302--