Re: is "\S+\s*$" with MULTILINE_MASK broken?

"Mark F. Murphy" <[email protected]> Thu, 15 May 2003 09:17:58 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.jakarta.oro.devel
Message-ID	<p05210654bae96e15cdf6@[192.168.100.8]>

At 12:01 PM -0400 5/15/03, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>In message <[email protected]>, "Daniel 
>F. Savarese
>" writes:
>>it's an intended distinction).  I'll look at it over the weekend because
>>the source of the discrepancy is not immediately obvious to me.  If
>
>My brain wouldn't let me put it off until the weekend.  I tracked down
>the problem and fixed it.  Check out the latest CVS source to verify.
>I'll ask for a vote for 2.0.8 release next week.

Now that's a fast turn around time!

Great work Daniel!

mark

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mark F. Murphy, Director Software Development   <mailto:[email protected]>
  Tyrell Software Corp                            <http://www.tyrell.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------