Re: [RESULT][VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

>Now I see it went "just" to general & pmc, because I was following on 
>the informative re-broadcast, so this is the reason why it has not been 
>counted.

No, I screwed up.  I remember counting your vote and verifying "bindingness"
against the committee file, but screwed up and didn't record it because
I was interrupted by something else at the time.

>I think (I seem to recall it used to be done) that VOTEs should specify 
>"where" they should happen.

Yes, I should have done that.  It was okay for the announcement to go
to multiple lists, but I should have specified a list for the casting of
votes.  I'll restate the vote results for the record.

daniel