DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37909] - No Implementation-Vendor-Id in manifest of jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37909>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37909





------- Additional Comments From [email protected]  2005-12-15 20:52 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> actually, we need this (in my company) to specify dependencies in to oro in our 
> apps with the Extension-List mechanism. For instance Tomcat does not consider 
> that a dependency is resolved if the "extension" we depend on does not specify 
> this entry. 

Thanks.  I don't think most of us at Jakarta were aware that this was becoming
an issue.  We've updated the packaging instructions at 
  http://jakarta.apache.org/site/packageversioning.html
to include Implementaton-Vendor-Id.  It would seem we should have been doing
this since J2SE 1.3.

The change I made to oro is in the main trunk.  If you haven't already
manually fixed the manifest for your purposes, you can either build the
latest version of the source from:
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/oro/trunk/
or rebuild the 2.0.8 source using the current:
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/oro/trunk/build.properties
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/oro/trunk/build.xml

I don't think the change is significant enough to merit a 2.0.9 release
(it would be 2.0.8 with just build.properties and build.xml changed).
But if there is some reason why it's necessary, I can call for a
release vote.  Further discussion should happen on the oro-dev mailing
list (no use cluttering this issue report).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.