[jira] [Commented] (PLUTO-698) TCK: Contesting V2AddlFilterTests which assume getInitParameterNames returns parameters in a particular order
"Vernon Singleton (JIRA)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.pluto.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16391329#comment-16391329 ]
Vernon Singleton commented on PLUTO-698:
----------------------------------------
This PR has been tested against the pluto tck master:
[https://github.com/ngriffin7a/portals-pluto/pull/24]
> TCK: Contesting V2AddlFilterTests which assume getInitParameterNames returns parameters in a particular order
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PLUTO-698
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-698
> Project: Pluto
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Vernon Singleton
> Assignee: Scott Nicklous
> Priority: Minor
>
> Neither the specification nor the Javadoc specify that PortletConfig.getInitParameterNames() should return parameters in any particular order. Yet, the tck assumes that they have a particular order [as of this commit 20a312be in master|[https://github.com/apache/portals-pluto/blob/20a312be1b0b180c105b190fd1d7b0f9a44f0ce1/portlet-tck_3.0/V2AddlFilterTests/src/main/java/javax/portlet/tck/portlets/AddlFilterTests_SPEC2_20_Filter.java#L140-L141].]
> Since different portlet container implementations may return them in a different order, we propose a patch to the tck to ignore the order of the returned parameters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)