RE: What's up with DAV:comment?

On the one hand I can see the need to be compliant whenever and wherever we
can.  On the other hand a property by any other name will smell as sweet, or
to put it differently, why do we need specific support for a comment?  Does
not PROPPATCH AND PROPFIND work?

Michael Oliver
CTO
Alarius Systems LLC
6800 E. Lake Mead Blvd, #1096
Las Vegas, NV 89156
Phone:(702)866-9034
Cell:(518)378-6154
Fax:(702)974-0341
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Wolf [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: What's up with DAV:comment?

If i understand http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3253.txt, than DAV:comment could
be used to set a comment to a resource.

For the current project i am working on, i need the possibility to add a
comment to a resource which should be PUT
to the server.

The problem is that i couldn't find any implementation for DAV:comment on
both sides, server and client.
Is this solved different for slide or is there no requirement for this
property?

Regards,
Matthias Wolf