Re: pre-proposal..
Roland Weber <[email protected]> Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:42:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.slide.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.jmeter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > sebb wrote: >> The Httpclient and JMeter mailing lists are quite busy, and would not >> benefit from being merged; the same might apply to Slide. > > Slide is low-traffic. Server part is not maintained that much (and people are moving to > Jakckrabbit), but the webdavclient still has a future. > >> Can a TLP have multiple independent mailing lists? > > Yep, that's up to the TLP, although it's preferable that there are no independent lists (which will > eventually get you in the same situation Jakarta is in). I think it would be good to keep the separate user lists and join the developer lists. Although I would suggest that commit messages get sent to a dedicated list, just as we're doing it in HttpComponents right now. Here are some numbers for Slide, JMeter and HttpComponents (subscribers + digest subscribers): jmeter-user 578 + 18 slide-user 430 + 12 httpclient-user 286 + 7 slide-dev 220 + 3 httpcomponents-dev 180 + 0 jmeter-dev 165 + 1 httpcomponents-commits 6 + 0 I doubt that the 430+ slide users would be happy about suddenly getting all httpclient-user messages, and the same goes for httpclient users and slide messages. The two httpcomponents lists show how many people are actually interested in the commit messages :-) cheers, Roland