Re: @StrutsParameter
Ute Kaiser <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2025 21:24:38 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I would also appreciate some more information on this. I use annotated public declarations on Strings, int, long without explicit g= etter/setter, but for objects I spread around with annotations on both gette= r and setter since I have not found out yet which is the right one to annota= te for different scenarios. For displaying, it seems ok to use public declarations on everything, but when save with validations is needed, I struggle with lost values and =E2= =80=9Eno access=E2=80=9C errors Best regards Ute Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 25.09.2025 um 19:09 schrieb Prasanth <[email protected]>: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFYeah, the code works. Even when it was a Boolean inside the Vecto= r @StrutsParameter had to be used on getXXX method. So I assume that irrespe= ctive of the object type inside the Vector we have to annotate the getXXX me= thod for Vectors. >=20 > Thanks, > Prasanth >=20 >> On 9/25/25 11:59 AM, Dave Newton wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:24 Prasanth <[email protected]> wrote= : >>>=20 >>> public Vector<String> getDistributionAmounts() >> =E2=80=A6 >>=20 >>> public void setContacts(ArrayList<Long> contacts) >>>=20 >>> As you can see above which method (getXXX/setXXX) has to be annotated is= >>> changing between Vector and ArrayList. >>=20 >> It also changes the generic type; did it work with strings? >>=20 >> d >>=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >=20