Re: Memory leak in ELEvaluator: approaches and alternatives

On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:06 AM  September 26, Henri Yandell wrote:

> 1.0.x as opposed to 1.1.x. Which raises the question, what else was
> committed to 1.0.x that was not committed to 1.1.x (or to Commons EL).

After poking around the svn repository, it looks like this is the  
only thing. The tags are all associated with release versions (beta,  
early adopter, RC and releases) and of the four branches, STANDARD_10  
held no other suprises, test_branch didn't appear to contain any  
actual code in it, "bayern" was created in 2001 and had no changes  
since its initial branching -- and also no messages as to what it  
might be for -- and standard-111_JAXP13_BRANCH, since it deals with  
1.1, is not relevant.

So, no, I think this is the only thing that was missed.

Bjorn