Re: Slowly x:forEach/x:out tags

Hi guys, thanks for the replies.
It's on the interests of everyone to get this one fixed, been jstl a
especification and the taglibs the reference implementation of those.
I could help in testing this if it's needed. I could help reviewing
and if I can, i could help with some development either. Because
otherwise we will stuck in 1.0.6 forever :)

regards
Emerson


2008/10/27 Kris Schneider <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Kris Schneider <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:44 PM, emerson cargnin
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> So there is no plans to fix this is future versions?
>>>
>>> I'd have to say, no, there doesn't seem to be a plan to fix this in
>>> Standard 1.1.
>>>
>>>> We have quite a few number of x:forEach/x:out on our JSPs. I believe
>>>> our managers wouldn't be willing to refactor all the pages to switch
>>>> that for xslt, which I'd believe would be overkill.
>>>
>>> Understood.
>>>
>>>> Is there someone in charge of the x taglibs?
>>>
>>> I suppose that would be Jakarta committers with an interest in the
>>> Standard taglib. I happen to be one of those, but I'm not actively
>>> working on it at the moment. It seems like this is really one of the
>>> worst areas of the implementation, but it's hard to gauge how much
>>> pain it's actually causing (besides yours, of course). There's not
>>> much traffic on the Jakarta taglibs lists and I have no idea if this
>>> ever comes up on other lists/forums. Personally, I'd love to be able
>>> to fix it, but I just can't promise to be able to make the time to do
>>> it. Maybe...
>>
>> It's the ugliest bug in the taglibs. I spent some time on it last
>> year, but couldn't identify a solution as I was knee deep in copied
>> Xerces (or was it Xalan?) internals.
>
> Yup, pretty much exactly where I was at with:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27717#c1 (wow, that
> was 4.5 years ago!)
>
> Haven't had the time, or nerve ;-), to go back...yet...
>
> I'm pretty sure I dumped it into an email here a while back, but one
> of the things I thought would be worth investigating is to use JAXP
> 1.3 (https://jaxp.dev.java.net/) and integrate with the
> javax.xml.xpath API instead of Xerces/Xalan. I'm pretty sure JAXP 1.3
> got backported to Java 1.3, but I'm not sure if the same thing
> happened with JAXP 1.4.
>
>> Hen
>
> --
> Kris Schneider <mailto:[email protected]>
> directThought  <http://www.directThought.com/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>