Re: Nested request in <c:import>

"Clint Popetz" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.taglibs.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/3/06, Kris Schneider <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the same context, <c:import> is the equivalent of
> RequestDispatcher.include, so the request scope is essentially shared. Is
> it possible for you to refactor either the included servlet or your
> controller to avoid the stomping?

Not easily.  But I just checked around, and the Spring MVC controller
had a bit of code to check for the presence of
javax.servlet.include.request_uri in the request and save away a copy
of the request attributes, restoring them after view rendering, so
that's what I'll do.

-Clint

> Clint Popetz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Under jsp 2.0 (jstl 1.2), is there any way to force <c:import>, or
> > perhaps the requestDispatcher.include() in particular, to set up a new
> > request scope when the resource is in the same context?  I'm using
> > <c:import> to do sort of a lightweight tiles replacement for a page
> > menu, and the imported servlet execution is stomping on some of my
> > request variables that my controller sets up for the view.  So, for
> > example:
> >
> > Controller does request.setAttribute("someModel",x);
> >
> > jsp does <c:import>
> >
> > imported controller does request.setAttribute("someModel",y)
> >
> > jsp for imported controller is happy (finds y)
> >
> > import returns
> >
> > jspi for original controller finds y instead of x under "someModel",
> > and bad things happen.
> >
> > I'd really like the imported servlet to see a wrapped/cloned request,
> > in which it muck with anything, but that the original request context
> > is untouched.  I don't know if this prohibited by the jsp spec though.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Clint
>
> --
> Kris Schneider <mailto:[email protected]>
> D.O.Tech       <http://www.dotech.com/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.