Re: spam

The archives do some degree of address mangling. But the original is
always available in some form or other.

It would be very difficult (but not necessarily impossible) to
maintain the degree of open communication that we value while doing
truly effective and complete address mangling.

Joshua.

On 7/15/07, Trenton D. Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
> Shouldn't the archives be mangling the email addresses, or not
> displaying them?  I'm going to subscribe under an alias.  At least an
> alias can be deleted. :)
>
> Sorry, I was a little jumpy.  I should have expected this.
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Sorry Trenton, this is a public mailing list. There are multiple
> > original archives (ie: not mirrors) across the internet.
> >
> > Presumably you also want the email you just sent removed. I'll cc this
> > reply to [email protected] in case there's anything they can
> > do.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On 7/14/07, Trenton D. Adams <trent@CENSORED> wrote:
> >> I just received spam at one of my email addresses.  This email address
> >> has NEVER been exposed to the web.  Now it has been, by this user list.
> >> Get your act together for crying out loud guys.
> >>
> >> Please, remove my email address from this post, or delete the post.
> >>
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-taglibs-user/200611.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>