Re: xalan usage in taglibs
Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:30:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.taglibs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACLE=7NGEBuTjYxxukYqH-5HR0ABbO0L5ijNsUxT6Vw+3DFZRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--089e0821ff5013dca00569077fe0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That is why we have that hardcoded dep ATM but in tomee it creates as much issues for apps not using that featire than it solves problem for others :( Le 4 avr. 2018 17:24, "Matthew Broadhead" <[email protected]> a =C3=A9crit : > i posted these links to the issue. did anyone see them? they seem > important to the problem > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6340802/java-xpath-apach > e-jaxp-implementation-performance > https://blogs.sap.com/2009/12/04/performance-improvements-in > -nw-java-applications-with-xml-processing/ > > On 08/12/2017 17:08, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > >> ok i created an issue https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla >> /show_bug.cgi?id=3D61875 >> >> On 08/12/2017 16:29, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> >>> On Dec 8, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> here is a patch which removes the xalan dependency. but it breaks the >>>> ForEachTagTest. >>>> i notice that every constructor generates a JSTLXPathCompiler. could i= t >>>> not be a singleton? >>>> >>> Thanks for the patch. I tried applying it but it looks like the support >>> classes from o.a.t.standard.xpath e.g. JSTLXPathCompiler were not inclu= ded >>> - please could you update. It would also be easier to read the diff if = you >>> removed the old code rather than commenting it out. >>> >>> How about creating an new issue in Bugzilla and attaching patches to >>> that. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jeremy >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --089e0821ff5013dca00569077fe0--