Re: Q on publishing the archetype
Jeffery Painter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Georg, I am fine with the README.md ... should we move the setup instructions then that I wrote in src/main/resources/archetype-resources/README.txt up to the main README.md that appears on the git page? I can do this if you like since it would then be more visible. I guess what I meant was how to you publish the archetype (not the website) so that we can bump the revision number? The older versions are here: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/turbine/maven/archetypes/ <https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/turbine/maven/archetypes/tags/> I think we are on 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT still for turbine-webapp-5.0 Could we align the version number in the pom.xml of the archetype to better match the version of turbine it is associated with? I don't care one way or the other, just a thought. How does version 1.0.3 get finalized, voted on and then made available in the archetype catalog? That is the step I am missing :-) Also, looks like that mysql connector update just came out. Do you have an automated way that you monitor dependency updates or do you just check them manually? I have sadly just been looking on maven repo central to see what is new when I think about it. Also - if/when I get some downtime, I can take a shot at updating the README.txt files in turbine-trunk and fulcrum to markdown formatted files Thanks! Jeffery On 7/24/19 7:52 AM, Georg Kallidis wrote: > Hi Jeffery, > > I think, we may stay for now just with README.md without a site? We do > provide a src/changes/changes.xml, which could be retrieved by xdoc and > build a maven site. > > If we want a site, we may use just the same site generation mechanism as > we do for the other components, but may need to create a git branch > "asf-site" with the generated content (using a script or a manual), see > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available.). Infra > then seems to be able to get this published after an initial announcement. > We may end up with something like > https://github.com/apache/turbine-archetypes/asf-site with the static > generated files being there. As no site yet exists for turbine-archetype > we may not even vote to change something, but would just do it IMO! An > example, what to do, may be found here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14105. > There is also a wiki entry "Building and Deploying Web Sites with > GitPubSub and Jenkins/Buildbot" (in progress) from INFRA but yet without > much content: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75964385. > > > Best regards, Georg > > N.B. For Turbine core a fast and small step to be more git friendly would > be to change README.txt in turbine-trunk to README.md and adapt to > md-syntax. ;-) > > > > > Von: Jeffery Painter <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Datum: 23.07.2019 20:51 > Betreff: Q on publishing the archetype > > > > Hi Georg, > > Do you have any instructions on how to publish the turbine-archetype? I > am not certain how this should be done compared to the other projects > (same steps or not?) > > I think it is ready so that we can update it to start working with > turbine 5.1 in svn. And push the fix you made with fulcrum-parser and > pooling. > > Thanks! > > Jeff > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >