Re: RfD: Turbine Logging with java.lang.System.Logger

Hi Thomas,

I also have no strong opinions, and I support any simplification in 
logging use/configuration.

-

Jeff


On 1/8/26 11:07, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> when updating the Turbine dependencies, I found that the list of Log4j libraries that we use is quite comprehensive. Several other dependency libraries use slf4j as well. I was a bit hesitant to open this subject again because everyone seems to have strong opinions about logging. But anyway, here it goes:
>
> Since Java 9, the JDK has a much improved logger implementation in java.lang.System.Logger. I switched to this in commons-jcs3 and it turned out to be quite powerful. The standard implementations relies on JUL bust it supports a simple Service Loader mechanism to redirect logging to an implementation of your choice (for log4j2, one would simply add the log4j-jpl dependency).
>
> See the blog article https://renato.athaydes.com/posts/java-system-logging for more information.
> See my slim wrapper around the logger to keep the familiar methods in org.apache.commons.jcs3.log.SystemLogAdapter
>
> I have no strong feelings about this but wanted to start the discussion anyway.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Bye, Thomas
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>