RE: Working towards a formal jcs release...

"Smuts, Aaron" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.jcs.devel
Message-ID <F117F441A30ACD42A50F285320C40E610234B382@sgtulmsp04.Global.ad.sabre.com>
Missed this email.  I'll see if I can make the tests more reliable.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Vandahl [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:28 AM
> To: JCS Developers List
> Subject: Re: Working towards a formal jcs release...
> 
> Scott Eade wrote:
> > There are still a number of failures, but it looks like there is
some
> > cleanup that is not happening between tests that is causing an
earlier
> > failure to retail a lock that is then causing later failures.  I get
> > something like this:
> >
> > Testcase:
> >
>
testBasicOptimization(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskC
ac
> heOptimizationUnitTest):
> > FAILED
> > The post optimization size should be smaller.
> 
> I can confirm that the current HEAD gives the following failed tests
on
> Mac OS-X (JDK 1.5.0):
> 
>     [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7,492
sec
>     [junit] [ERROR] TEST
>
org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheOptimizationUnitTe
st
> FAILED
> [...]
>     [junit] Running
> org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.jdbc.JDBCDiskCacheShrinkUnitTest
>     [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 15,478
sec
>     [junit] [ERROR] TEST
> org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.jdbc.JDBCDiskCacheShrinkUnitTest FAILED
> 
> 
> 
> Bye, Thomas.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.