Re: Progress towards a release
"Al Forbes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.jcs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, For the next release it would be nice to branch the jdk13 version and have a meaningful name. Maybe jdk13_1.3.0 (or jdk13_1.2.8) The first release based on jdk14 could then use the normal sequence - either starting with 1.4 or 2.0. It might be good to start the first jdk14 release with 2.0. Al On 16/04/07, Scott Eade <[email protected]> wrote: > So going over the messages triggered by my email of 10 days ago I have > the following list: > > * There are a small number of apparent test failures - Scott noted a > few, Thomas noted just one. > I have spent some time today looking at these and Aaron is quite right - > they do all run successfully. The apparent failures crop up when the > tests are run via maven on a fast machine - if the test classes are > executed individually they run just fine. Is there a way we can alter > these so that they can execute correctly in all cases? > > * A review of project.xml revealed a number of dependencies using fairly > old versions. > I have just now committed an update that brings most of these up to > date. I also added the jar and java plugin properties suggested by > Thomas to explicitly state the compiler version desired by Aaron and to > include this information in the jar manifest. > > * The source headers are still to be updated. I was thinking that this > should wait until the all the tests pass, but since they actually do > there is no longer any need to hold off doing this. Henning, can you > please proceed with running your script against > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/jcs/trunk > > * Michael Stevens has offered to produce a Maven 2 POM (for users of > Maven 2, not for building purposes). Michael, there is no time like the > present... > > * There are seven open issues in Jira. I am of the opinion that JCS-13 > should be skipped for now. Are there any strong opinions on the others? > > * What version number will we call the release? "1.2.7.9.3" may raise a > few eyebrows. > > Let's get the above sorted, then we can build a site and release package > on which to vote. Thomas's release experience will come in handy at > this point. > > Let me know if I have missed anything. > > Scott > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >