RE: Progress towards a release

We don't need to put the word jdk in the name.  1.3.* will be the last
jdk 1.3 compliant releases.  That will make it easy to remember.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Forbes [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:56 AM
> To: JCS Developers List
> Subject: Re: Progress towards a release
> 
> Hi,
> 
> For the next release it would be nice to branch the jdk13 version and
> have a meaningful name. Maybe jdk13_1.3.0 (or jdk13_1.2.8)
> 
> The first release based on jdk14 could then use the normal sequence -
> either starting with 1.4 or 2.0. It might be good to start the first
> jdk14 release with 2.0.
> 
> Al
> 
> On 16/04/07, Scott Eade <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So going over the messages triggered by my email of 10 days ago I
have
> > the following list:
> >
> > * There are a small number of apparent test failures - Scott noted a
> > few, Thomas noted just one.
> > I have spent some time today looking at these and Aaron is quite
right -
> > they do all run successfully.  The apparent failures crop up when
the
> > tests are run via maven on a fast machine - if the test classes are
> > executed individually they run just fine.  Is there a way we can
alter
> > these so that they can execute correctly in all cases?
> >
> > * A review of project.xml revealed a number of dependencies using
fairly
> > old versions.
> > I have just now committed an update that brings most of these up to
> > date.  I also added the jar and java plugin properties suggested by
> > Thomas to explicitly state the compiler version desired by Aaron and
to
> > include this information in the jar manifest.
> >
> > * The source headers are still to be updated.  I was thinking that
this
> > should wait until the all the tests pass, but since they actually do
> > there is no longer any need to hold off doing this.  Henning, can
you
> > please proceed with running your script against
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/jcs/trunk
> >
> > * Michael Stevens has offered to produce a Maven 2 POM (for users of
> > Maven 2, not for building purposes).  Michael, there is no time like
the
> > present...
> >
> > * There are seven open issues in Jira.  I am of the opinion that
JCS-13
> > should be skipped for now.  Are there any strong opinions on the
others?
> >
> > * What version number will we call the release?  "1.2.7.9.3" may
raise a
> > few eyebrows.
> >
> > Let's get the above sorted, then we can build a site and release
package
> > on which to vote.  Thomas's release experience will come in handy at
> > this point.
> >
> > Let me know if I have missed anything.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]