Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Scott Eade wrote:
>   
>> Sorry to be a pain Thomas, but I'm afraid the pom that is included jar
>> directory is no good.  Can you please use the version that I committed
>> last week - the important bits that are missing are the scope and
>> optional elements within the dependency elements (an no need for the
>> war.bundle.jar properties where present).
>>     
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. I did a maven1 build and scopes are a maven2
> thing AFAIK. Please clarify.
>   
Sorry for the misunderstanding - the pom you have produced is probably 
fine for people using jcs with maven 1.  I am thinking about the pom 
that will be deployed to the maven 2 repository to make it easy for 
people to use jcs in their projects that are built with maven 2.  In my 
experience (by no means complete) the poms don't appear to provide much 
benefit for projects built with maven 1, but for maven 2 they are 
essential for transitive dependencies (where scope and optional are 
important).

Since we have it, I would like to see the maven 2 pom included in the 
release.

Scott