[mevenide-dev] [jira] Commented: (MEVENIDE-639) complete the J2eeModule implementation so directory deployment will be successful.
"Jaromir Uhrik (JIRA)" <jira-yCVjj/[email protected]> Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:14:19 -0600 (CST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.mevenide.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <29848531.1228320859748.JavaMail.haus-jira@codehaus01.managed.contegix.com> |
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEVENIDE-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=156553#action_156553 ]
Jaromir Uhrik commented on MEVENIDE-639:
----------------------------------------
This bug was transferred to the NetBeans Issuezilla bug tracking system as http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=154501
> complete the J2eeModule implementation so directory deployment will be successful.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MEVENIDE-639
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEVENIDE-639
> Project: mevenide
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mevenide2-netbeans
> Affects Versions: NB_3.1
> Environment: NetBeans 6.1, mac os x 10.4.11
> Reporter: vince kraemer
> Assignee: Milos Kleint
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: NB_3.2
>
>
> many of the methods that need to return valid FileObjects return nulls. Without valid return values, directory deployment fails. I am adding more checks to the GF plugin to prevent attempting to do a directory deployment when the J2eeModule implementation doesn't support the contract.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email